Should the Head of Human Resources Report to the CEO?
Written by Erik Samdahl from i4cp on September 08, 2009
With many human resource departments still grappling with how to become more strategic, a recent study by i4cp revealed several opportunities based on how HR is typically organized.
In the study, respondents were asked to specify how their HR organization was structured on a regional, functional and team level. Results varied by company size, understandably, but several gaps were identified between higher market performing organizations - those companies that have shown considerable revenue growth and increased market share over the last five years - and low-performing organizations. Some of these gaps are listed below (for organizations of 10,000 employees and more):
- High market performers are more likely to have HR structured with a combination of centers of excellence, shared services and HR generalists (65% versus only 44% for low performers).
- Global high performers tend to decentralize by country, whereas a vast majority of lower market performers decentralize by region/continent.
- More than 78% of higher market performers have the head of HR reporting directly to the CEO, versus 67% of low performers.
- Higher market performers rely much more heavily on multifunctional temporary team-based structures (43.5%) than low performers (28%).
- HR sets up more cross-functional teamsin higher-performing organizations (47.7%) than in low-performing ones (only 35 %).















Wendy Edwards will like to share on her opinoins regarding this issues.I think that they should fellow the organizational chart of the organization to the higher level to report too first, unless it is an emergency situation to look into. This is basically indicating that Human Resources Manager should have the department to report any situation to befor it can be dealt with at the CEO level.